Page 41/42 from FDA review "suspected COVID cases ", 3400 ,not included into side effects . What do you make of this ? Double in vaccinated group after second shot ? There is emerging data of people who had COVID and developed much stronger reaction to the vaccines
This is complex and gets into the details of the controlling Clinical Study Protocol document.
"Disease" had a highly specific and narrow definition. Each participant was required to maintain a daily electronic medical diary. If a participant reported 2 or more symptoms from a prescribed list of 8 symptoms (things like fever, persistent cough, loss of smell, etc.) for 3 or more days, then they'd be brought in for a PCR test. If they returned a test-positive, ONLY then would they be listed as having "symptomatic disease".
Several thousand subjects exhibited Covid-like symptoms but failed to meet the full criteria for any number of reasons. That's the 3400 being referenced.
It's WAY more than enough to significantly shift the final results in either direction...but that's the nature of these study protocols under regulatory conditons.
Why Were they permitted to blow up the trial placebo groups? This type of science serves to feed the concerns And theories people have about long term safety and efficacy data
Ethics concerns. They made a pitch to all the participants to remain cloaked and in the study, but also gave participants the option to un-cloak and opt to be given access to the vaccine if they were in the placebo arm of the trial.
Incredible work Mr. Dale. Thank you. Data does not likely exist yet, but can you comment on how long does some "protection" remain in the body after receiving the second vaccine shot ?
Is it better to get the Pfizer, moderna or the Johnson and Johnson vaccine? I am very concerned about toxicity since I already have exposure to severe mold an have symptoms.
Page 41/42 from FDA review "suspected COVID cases ", 3400 ,not included into side effects . What do you make of this ? Double in vaccinated group after second shot ? There is emerging data of people who had COVID and developed much stronger reaction to the vaccines
Thank you
This is complex and gets into the details of the controlling Clinical Study Protocol document.
"Disease" had a highly specific and narrow definition. Each participant was required to maintain a daily electronic medical diary. If a participant reported 2 or more symptoms from a prescribed list of 8 symptoms (things like fever, persistent cough, loss of smell, etc.) for 3 or more days, then they'd be brought in for a PCR test. If they returned a test-positive, ONLY then would they be listed as having "symptomatic disease".
Several thousand subjects exhibited Covid-like symptoms but failed to meet the full criteria for any number of reasons. That's the 3400 being referenced.
It's WAY more than enough to significantly shift the final results in either direction...but that's the nature of these study protocols under regulatory conditons.
Why Were they permitted to blow up the trial placebo groups? This type of science serves to feed the concerns And theories people have about long term safety and efficacy data
Ethics concerns. They made a pitch to all the participants to remain cloaked and in the study, but also gave participants the option to un-cloak and opt to be given access to the vaccine if they were in the placebo arm of the trial.
Please do this for the Pfizer report for 5-12 year olds
Incredible work Mr. Dale. Thank you. Data does not likely exist yet, but can you comment on how long does some "protection" remain in the body after receiving the second vaccine shot ?
Is it better to get the Pfizer, moderna or the Johnson and Johnson vaccine? I am very concerned about toxicity since I already have exposure to severe mold an have symptoms.